The petitioner had argued that elected representatives are required to take the oath either in the name of God or in the name of the Constitution, and that invoking specific deities was contrary to the prescribed oath and constitutional principles.
The petitioner had argued that elected representatives are required to take the oath either in the name of God or in the name of the Constitution, and that invoking specific deities was contrary to the prescribed oath and constitutional principles.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/fdb61c7793edde9db9364b69ebaee521669f1239" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="Oath Invalid, Kerala Court Orders Fresh Swearing-In For 20 BJP Councillors"></iframe>
The petitioner had argued that elected representatives are required to take the oath either in the name of God or in the name of the Constitution, and that invoking specific deities was contrary to the prescribed oath and constitutional principles.
