The panel said a substantial quantity of ₹500 notes was found in the storeroom and that Justice Varma, who resigned in April this year, could not give a satisfactory explanation about the source, ownership or presence of the cash.
The panel said a substantial quantity of ₹500 notes was found in the storeroom and that Justice Varma, who resigned in April this year, could not give a satisfactory explanation about the source, ownership or presence of the cash.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/fc657454bbabe1c1fb3998a2639950ab3abe7f24" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="‘Evasive, incomplete, misleading’: What Parliament panel said on Justice Yashwant Varma cash-at-home case"></iframe>
The panel said a substantial quantity of ₹500 notes was found in the storeroom and that Justice Varma, who resigned in April this year, could not give a satisfactory explanation about the source, ownership or presence of the cash.
