The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to privacy under Article 21 cannot shield a man from disclosing mobile call records and hotel stay details to prove adultery. Upholding the Delhi High Court's decision, the apex court stated that privacy is not absolute and can be restricted in public interest, especially when adultery is a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to privacy under Article 21 cannot shield a man from disclosing mobile call records and hotel stay details to prove adultery. Upholding the Delhi High Court's decision, the apex court stated that privacy is not absolute and can be restricted in public interest, especially when adultery is a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/f83cdb59e36e41512bcf73361a4badbc3bde863e" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="Spouse accused of adultery can't invoke right to privacy, says SC"></iframe>
The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to privacy under Article 21 cannot shield a man from disclosing mobile call records and hotel stay details to prove adultery. Upholding the Delhi High Court's decision, the apex court stated that privacy is not absolute and can be restricted in public interest, especially when adultery is a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
