The Delhi High Court noted that a company in the business of digital print media was bound to incur expenses on payment of salary, consultation fee, rent, etc, and the allegation of siphoning was therefore not tenable.
The Delhi High Court noted that a company in the business of digital print media was bound to incur expenses on payment of salary, consultation fee, rent, etc, and the allegation of siphoning was therefore not tenable.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/e03b4f8d6c5931477f6a41771cd340bbb98f5fcb" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="'Abuse Of Law': Delhi High Court Cancels Probe Agency ED's Cases Against NewsClick"></iframe>
The Delhi High Court noted that a company in the business of digital print media was bound to incur expenses on payment of salary, consultation fee, rent, etc, and the allegation of siphoning was therefore not tenable.
