U.P., Maharashtra, Punjab sought relook at 1978 judgment’s expansive definition of ‘industry’, which only excluded core sovereign activities; Bench considering whether state enterprises, schemes are industrial activities
U.P., Maharashtra, Punjab sought relook at 1978 judgment’s expansive definition of ‘industry’, which only excluded core sovereign activities; Bench considering whether state enterprises, schemes are industrial activities
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/cc30657cda893d6048a0cb0533e815d5d228529e" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="What is ‘industry’? Nine-judge Supreme Court Bench to pronounce verdict on term’s ambit"></iframe>
U.P., Maharashtra, Punjab sought relook at 1978 judgment’s expansive definition of ‘industry’, which only excluded core sovereign activities; Bench considering whether state enterprises, schemes are industrial activities
