Markets · 1 sources covering this

Why Supreme Court refused to make Edelweiss pay ₹900 crore to Anugrah investors

The Supreme Court has ruled that Edelweiss Custodial Services cannot be made liable for ₹900 crore in client securities lost after stockbroker Anugrah defaulted on its obligations.

Share:WhatsApp X Reddit Facebook LinkedIn

Coverage spectrum

0 L · 0 C · 1 R

How 1 sources are covering this

MintLean R·1h ago
Why Supreme Court refused to make Edelweiss pay ₹900 crore to Anugrah investors
The Supreme Court has ruled that Edelweiss Custodial Services cannot be made liable for ₹900 crore in client securities lost after stockbroker Anugrah defaulted on its obligations.
Read at Mint →

Embed this bias spectrum on your site

Paste this iframe wherever you'd like the widget to appear. Resizes responsively; no JS required.

<iframe
  src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/a2ed872c27951dd32d94e2ad75c818079f20099a"
  width="100%" height="320"
  style="border:0;max-width:680px"
  loading="lazy"
  title="Why Supreme Court refused to make Edelweiss pay ₹900 crore to Anugrah investors"></iframe>

Why Supreme Court refused to make Edelweiss pay ₹900 crore to Anugrah investors

How 1 sources are covering this

Why Supreme Court refused to make Edelweiss pay ₹900 crore to Anugrah investors

More from Markets

Global Market: China stocks rebound as investors await US jobs data, domestic economic indicators

Netweb Technologies share price up almost 45% in past 6 months - What's boosting the stock? Triggers explained

IFCI shares rally over 16% in two days as NSE IPO draws closer

Trump’s second-term policies put US finances under growing strain as debt tops $40 trillion

Reader

Trust & legal

Across the network