In 2017, the Archaeological Survey of India stated unambiguously that the Taj was a 17th-century tomb. The technology used in its construction and design, including pietra dura, did not exist in pre-medieval days. It should have ended any vestiges of controversy.
In 2017, the Archaeological Survey of India stated unambiguously that the Taj was a 17th-century tomb. The technology used in its construction and design, including pietra dura, did not exist in pre-medieval days. It should have ended any vestiges of controversy.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/58d758fa16354d93cb8b735cc66a9deb1b0b9ac8" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="Taj Mahal or ‘Tejo Mahalaya’? The legal tussle explained"></iframe>
