The Supreme Court’s May 21 clarification partially revives sedition proceedings under Section 124A for consenting accused persons; the direction creates disparity in the working of Section 124A and leaves accused caught between trial under an undecided law and indefinite limbo
The Supreme Court’s May 21 clarification partially revives sedition proceedings under Section 124A for consenting accused persons; the direction creates disparity in the working of Section 124A and leaves accused caught between trial under an undecided law and indefinite limbo
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/21e64b7d774a2b4e3e809c0f1364e101a581966d" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="A revival of sedition tied to consent"></iframe>
