Sonam Wangchuk's removal highlights a democratic paradox: the constitutional right to peaceful hunger strikes versus the state's duty to protect lives under Article 21, creating a legal clash between bodily autonomy and intervention.
Sonam Wangchuk's removal highlights a democratic paradox: the constitutional right to peaceful hunger strikes versus the state's duty to protect lives under Article 21, creating a legal clash between bodily autonomy and intervention.
<iframe src="https://hindustansphere.com/embed/cluster/0517d2c4a805cfdccd2c935420ac8b4188134e15" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="Sonam Wangchuk And Hunger Strikes: What The Law Says, And Doesn't"></iframe>
